Legal Opinion

Lampley v. Knox

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 15, 1890PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Barbour. Tried before the Hon. Jesse M. Carmichael.

1Opinion of the CourtMcOLELLAN, J.

Action of detinue by mortgagee, Lampley, after law-day, against mortgagor, Knox, in possession. The debt secured appeared by the face of the mortgage to be $308.80, eighty dollars of which it was admitted had been paid, and duly entered on the paper as a credit. There was evidence for the defendant tending to show that the consideration of the mortgage, to the extent of $240, was a debt due from defendant to a third person, Mrs. Hightower, which plaintiff agreed to pay for him, and which he had failed to pay. On the aspect of the case presented by this tendency of the evi*626dence, the court, at…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sanders v. Cassady & BlackwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  2. McKinnon v. LessleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  3. Bradford v. DanielSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Moorer v. Tensaw Land & Timber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  2. Brown v. LoebSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  3. Ramsey v. SibertSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  4. Watson v. HerringSupreme Court of Alabama · 1896
  5. Brandon v. Montgomery Iron WorksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API