Saterstad v. State of Nevada
District Court, D. Nevada
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 * * * 7 MARTIN SATERSTAD, et al., Case No. 2:16-CV-1702 JCM (GWF) 8 Plaintiff(s), ORDER 9 v. 10 THE STATE OF NEVADA, et al., 11 Defendant(s). 12 13 Presently before the court is defendants’ motion to dismiss.1 (ECF No. 26). Pro se 14 plaintiffs Martin Saterstad and Richard Saterstad (collectively, “plaintiffs”) filed a late response 15 (ECF No. 32), to which defendants replied (ECF No. 33). 16 Also before the court is plaintiffs’ motion to extend time to file a response. (ECF No. 29). 17 Defendants filed a response to the motion.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Starr v. BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Oscar W. Jones v. Lou Blanas County of SacramentoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Signed Personal Check No. 730 of MesleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.