Legal Opinion

The Atna

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided March 31, 1924No. 4272PublishedCited by 7 opinions

In Admiralty. Suit by Carl Waara against the steamer Atna, the Norwegian Africa & Australia Line, claimant, with John Gommerson aa intervening libelant. On exceptions to intervening libel.

1Opinion of the Court

CUSHMAN, District Judge.

Misalleged:

“That intervening libelant was a stevedore in the employ of a stevedoring firm engaged in loading and discharging the respondent vessel.
“* * * That the booms, cables, wenches and tackle used in handling cargo, belonged to the ship and were temporarily, for the purpose of handling the cargo, placed under the control of the stevedore company.
“That the officers of the ship, and members of the ship’s crew, were hired and employed by the owners and operators of the ship and worked in obedience to the orders of the captain; that the members of the ship’s crew…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Company v. JensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. The PlymouthSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  3. Grant Smith-Porter Ship Co. v. RohdeSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Atlantic Transport Co. of W. Va. v. ImbrovekSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. State Industrial Comm'n of NY v. Nordenholt Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. The Admiral PeoplesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Ford v. ParkerDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1943
  3. Richards v. MonahanDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1936
  4. Executive Jet Aviation, Inc. v. City of ClevelandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971
  5. The Shang HoDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API