Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Carr

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided September 27, 2004No. 3867PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, J.:

Martha M. Carr and Ruth Riley Glover appeal the master-in-equity’s ruling of specific performance. We reverse.1

FACTUAL/PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In 1996, Carr, a resident of New York, inherited from her mother a 108-acre tract of unimproved land. In 1998, Carr contacted the Campbells, who had leased the property for thirty years, about selling the property to them. Carr had *261telephone discussions with Betty Campbell. Carr asked Betty Campbell “how much the property went for.” Betty Campbell told her the Tax Assessor’s agricultural assessed value of the property was $54,000. On August…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  2. Ingram v. Kasey's AssociatesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  3. Lewis v. Premium Investment Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  4. Holly Hill Lumber Co., Inc. v. McCoySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1942
  5. Crowder v. CrowderSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Lowcountry Open Land Trust v. Charleston Southern UniversityCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
  2. Clardy v. BODOLOSKYCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009
  3. Rhett v. GrayCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2012
  4. Snow v. SmithCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2016
  5. Town of Kingstree v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2013

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API