Campbell v. Carr
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ANDERSON, J.:
Martha M. Carr and Ruth Riley Glover appeal the master-in-equity’s ruling of specific performance. We reverse.1
FACTUAL/PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
In 1996, Carr, a resident of New York, inherited from her mother a 108-acre tract of unimproved land. In 1998, Carr contacted the Campbells, who had leased the property for thirty years, about selling the property to them. Carr had *261telephone discussions with Betty Campbell. Carr asked Betty Campbell “how much the property went for.” Betty Campbell told her the Tax Assessor’s agricultural assessed value of the property was $54,000. On August…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
- Ingram v. Kasey's AssociatesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- Lewis v. Premium Investment Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
- Holly Hill Lumber Co., Inc. v. McCoySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1942
- Crowder v. CrowderSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Lowcountry Open Land Trust v. Charleston Southern UniversityCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
- Clardy v. BODOLOSKYCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009
- Rhett v. GrayCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2012
- Snow v. SmithCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2016
- Town of Kingstree v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2013
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.