Legal Opinion

Comar, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided May 19, 2004No. Nos. 03-1253, 03-1354PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGMENT

This petition for review was considered on the record from the National Labor Relations Board and the briefs of the parties. It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the petition for review be denied, and the cross-application for enforcement be granted.

Substantial evidence exists showing that the historically recognized bargaining unit at Comar’s Vineland facility remained appropriate after its relocation to the Buena facility: the former Vineland applicator division employees continued to perform the same work under essentially the same supervision; they did so in a separate room in a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Trident Seafoods, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
  2. Leach Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
  3. International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dodge of Naperville, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
  2. Stephen Glasser v. ADT Security Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  3. Int'l Longshore & Warehouse Union v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. ADT Security Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  5. Hadsall, Jennifer v. ADT, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API