Legal Opinion

William M. v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 2008No. 48649, 48650PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

These appeals center on Nevada’s presumptive certification statute, which consists of NRS 62B. 390(2) and (3). These provisions create a rebuttable presumption that juveniles who are over 13 years of age and charged with certain enumerated offenses fall outside of the jurisdiction of the juvenile court and must therefore be transferred to the district court for adult criminal proceedings. In particular, we examine NRS 62B.390(3)(b)’s rebuttal requirements in light of the right against self-incrimination guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Under NRS…

3Cases cited14 opinions

  1. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Estelle v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Lefkowitz v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Ramona R. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Sheriff, Washoe County v. SmithNevada Supreme Court · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. WatkinsWashington Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Commonwealth v. Taylor, N., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  3. IN RE: D. T., A MINORNevada Supreme Court · 2017
  4. IN RE: D. T., A MINORNevada Supreme Court · 2017
  5. In Re: P. J.-S.Nevada Supreme Court · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API