Legal Opinion
State v. Watkins
Washington Supreme Court
Decided August 16, 2018No. 94973-5PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFairhurst, C.J.
*832¶ 1 Sixteen year old Tyler William Watkins was charged with first degree burglary in adult court pursuant to former ROW 13.04.030(1) (2009), amended by Laws of 2018, chapter 162, section 1.1 Former RCW 13.04.030(1) (2009), part of the Basic Juvenile Court Act (BJCA), provided that juvenile courts must automatically decline jurisdiction over 16 and 17 year olds charged with enumerated offenses. Watkins argues that his due process rights were violated because the automatic decline component of former RCW 13.04.030(1) (2009) applied without him first having a hearing on whether the juvenile…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. GreggWashington Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. OrozcoIdaho Supreme Court · 2021
- State v. AlltusCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- City of Spokane v. Emma Rose RamosCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2024
- In the Matter of the Pers. Restraint of Vy ThangCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.