Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Manchac v. City of Orange
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided February 2, 1955No. 5034PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
R. L. MURRAY, Chief Justice.
The State of Texas, acting by the County Attorney of Orange County, on the relation of Frank D. Manchac, filed a motion in the district court of Orange County, praying for leave to file a petition in the nature of a quo warranto proceeding. The petition was upon the relation of Manchac and sought to challenge the validity of an annexation ordinance by the City of Orange. The district court of Orange County overruled and refused the motion for leave to file the petition. No hearing was had, no adverse parties were served, no action of any kind was taken in the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- City of Wichita Falls v. Bowen, TrusteeTexas Supreme Court · 1944
- Lefler v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
- Willman v. City of CorsicanaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
- State Ex Rel. Eckhart v. HoffTexas Supreme Court · 1895
- State Ex Rel. Thornhill v. HuntsakerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
3Cited by10 opinions
- Eagle Trucking Co. v. Texas Bitulithic Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1981
- Ramirez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1998
- State v. Fischer, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1989
- City of Bridge City v. State Ex Rel. City of Port Arthur, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1990
- City of Bridge City v. State Ex Rel. City of Port Arthur, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.