Legal Opinion

Baker v. Wilkes

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1927PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWm. E. Lee, C. J.

On the authority of Cupples v. Stanfield, 35 Ida. 466, 207 Pac. 326, the motion to dismiss the appeal is denied.

Appellants made and delivered to respondent their two interest-bearing promissory notes in the principal sum of $10,000, payment of which was secured by a mortgage on real property. The notes contained a provision that if the interest was not paid as provided, “the whole Sum of both principal and interest to become immediately due and collectible at the option of the holder of this note.” Claiming that interest in the sum of $197.33 became due on October 1, 1925, and had not been…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McKean v. German-American Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Cupples v. StanfieldIdaho Supreme Court · 1922
  3. State v. BairdIdaho Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Brinton v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Langford v. LangfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gunther v. WhiteTennessee Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States v. BennionIdaho Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Sparks v. Rowley Mines, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API