Legal Opinion
Cramp v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided March 3, 2004No. A03A2264PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ANDREWS, Presiding Judge.
Robin Cramp sued Georgia-Pacific Corporation and Unisource Worldwide, Inc. for fraud. The trial court granted Georgia-Pacific’s and Unisource’s motion for summary judgment. Cramp appeals and we affirm for the reasons set forth below.
To prevail on a motion for summary judgment, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact, and that the undisputed facts, viewed in a light most favorable to the party opposing the motion, warrant judgment as a matter of law. OCGA§ 9-11-56 (c); Lau’s Corp. v. Haskins, 261 Ga. 491 (405 SE2d 474) (1991).…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lau's Corp., Inc. v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
- Supchak v. PruittCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- Pyle v. City of CedartownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- Adamson v. MaddoxCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- Adamson v. MaddoxCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ford v. CaffreyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
- Hendricks v. Smartvideo Technologies, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2007
- Tart v. IMV Energy Systems of America, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2005
- Cramp v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2004