United States v. Bekhrad
District Court, S.D. Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
WOLLE, District Judge.
Plaintiff asserts in its complaint a claim against the defendant for civil penalties under the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. section 3729. In various resisted motions defendant urges that the requested relief-triple damages plus $10,000 in civil penalties — is not authorized by the statute applicable here. Additionally, he attacks some language in the complaint as impertinent and other language as vague.
I. THE APPLICABILITY OF THE 1986 AMENDMENT.
Penalties allowed under the False Claims Act were increased from $2,000 and double damages to $10,000 and triple damages in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Liudas Kairys, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Kairys v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Patrick T. VanellaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Brett C. KimberlinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. Paul B. MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Tyger Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- United States Ex Rel. McCoy v. California Medical Review, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1989
- Gravitt v. General Electric Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1988
- United States v. PaniDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.