Legal Opinion

Russ v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 7, 1942PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

The rights and duties of the parties are to be measured by the law of Virginia. Harrison v. R. R., 168 N. C., 382, 84 S. E., 519. Matters of procedure are controlled by the law of the forum. Wise v. Hollowell, 205 N. C., 286, 171 S. E., 82. In other words, the lex loci furnishes the standard of conduct; the lex fori the method and manner of trial. Clodfelter v. Wells, 212 N. C., 823, 195 S. E., 11. The one is substantive; the other procedural. “The actionable quality of the defendant’s conduct in inflicting injury upon the plaintiff must be determined by the law of the place where the injury…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Howard v. . HowardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  2. Barnes v. AshworthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1930
  3. Redmon v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  4. Wise v. . HollowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  5. Clodfelter v. . WellsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Charnock v. . TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  2. Lowe's North Wilkesboro Hardware, Inc. v. The Fidelity Mutual Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1963
  3. Harper v. . Harper and Wickham v. . HarperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  4. Harper v. HarperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  5. Young v. Baltimore and Ohio Railroad CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API