Legal Opinion

Shadburn v. Tapp

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 14, 1953No. 18238PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Head, Justice.

In the first four grounds of the amended motion for new trial, and in ground 13, it is asserted that the court erred in excluding oral and documentary evidence offered for the purpose of showing that, at the time Glyndon P. Tapp went into business, he used funds obtained from his father’s estate, which belonged to all of his father’s heirs, to obtain necessary equipment, and that his brothers and sisters assisted him financially in his business. Counsel insist that this evidence would illustrate the reasonableness of the alleged intention pf the deceased to make a will leaving…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hardeman v. EllisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  2. Jones v. HogansSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  3. Gordon v. SpellmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
  4. Tidwell v. GarrickSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
  5. Johnson v. ChampionSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Boggs v. Griffeth Bros. Tire Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  2. Martin v. AlfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
  3. Thomas v. ScottSupreme Court of Georgia · 1966
  4. Boyd v. SummerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API