Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Carter

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 29, 1990Published

1DissentTitone, J.

It has been observed that a Grand Jury can indict anyone or anything — even a ham sandwich.1 *108Now, under the majority’s holding, apparently anyone can present the People’s case to the Grand Jury — even an unadmitted layperson masquerading as an attorney. Because this position makes a mockery of both the rules prohibiting legal practice by laypersons and the Grand Jury system itself, I dissent.

In People v Di Falco (44 NY2d 482, 488), after analyzing the history and import of CPL 190.25 (3) and 210.35 (5), this Court held that "where an unauthorized prosecutor conducts the [Grand Jury]…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. IannoneNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. People v. Calbud, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. People v. JonesNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. People v. DunbarNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. People v. MinetNew York Court of Appeals · 1947

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API