Legal Opinion

Bozorgkhoo v. Blinken

District Court, E.D. California

Decided May 19, 2025No. 2:24-cv-03154Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SAKINEH BOZORGKHOO, et al., No. 2:24-cv-03154 CSK 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 14 ANTHONY J. BLINKEN, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Six plaintiffs, one United States citizen and five Iranian citizens, proceed on a 18 petition for writ of mandamus and complaint for injunctive relief.1 (ECF No. 1.) 19 Defendants Anthony Blinken and Robert Jachim, federal officials sued in their official 20 capacity, seek to dismiss the complaint under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  4. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Lee v. City Of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API