Legal Opinion · Dissent

Erdman v. Condaire, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 3, 2002No. ED 80447, ED 80448Published

1DissentGeorge W. Draper Iii, Judge

I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion and find that there was substantial evidence to support the submission of negligence against Condaire and Sachs. While I would agree with the majority’s discussion of the holdings in Killian, Mino, and Williamson, supra, I respectfully disagree with the majority’s application of those cases to the instant cause. While I disagree with the majority on this, I would find the trial court committed reversible error in submitting Erdman’s verdict directing instruction in that the instruction fails to state a necessary element of his claim for…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Giddens v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2000
  2. Seitz v. Lemay Bank and Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1998
  3. State Ex Rel. Webster v. CorneliusMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Kauzlarich v. Atchison, Topeka, & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1995
  5. Egelhoff v. HoltSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API