Legal Opinion

Monahan v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 5, 1942No. Appeals, 296 and 297PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Kenworthey; J.,

Wife-plaintiff entered one of defendant’s street cars which started with a “sudden jolt” while she was standing still reaching for an upright pole. She was thrown on the floor, striking her back at the base of her spine, as a result of which she sustained a compression fracture of two vertebrae. There was no evidence of the effect of the action of the car on other passengers except that they became “excited” and two or three of them “bent over.” On the facts thus far stated, plaintiffs were not entitled to go to the jury. (See Coyle v. Pittsburgh Railways Company, 149…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Coyle v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  2. Hawkins v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Herholtz Et Vir v. West Penn Rys. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  2. Smith v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  3. G.N. Green v. SEPTACommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. Smith v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  5. Smith v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API