Legal Opinion
Neill v. City of Red Wing
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided October 12, 1923No. 23,564PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
The appeal is from an order granting a temporary injunction in a suit by a taxpayer of the city of Red Wing to permanently enjoin the city and its officers from erecting a municipal light and power plant and from issuing and selling bonds for that purpose.
The rule is settled that this court will not reverse an order granting or refusing a temporary injunction, unless it is made to appear that the action of the court below was an abuse of discretion. The late cases so holding are: Minneapolis Gaslight Co. v. City of Minneapolis, 123 Minn. 231, 143 N. W. 728; Potter v. Engler, 130 Minn. 510,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Chickaming v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Minneapolis Gaslight Co. v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- State ex rel. City of Carthage v. GordonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
- Stokes v. City of MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
- Ekeberg v. MackaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lybrand v. Wafford (1)Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
- Village of Blaine v. Independent School District No. 12Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- Schmidt v. GouldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- School District No. 1 v. LindheSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935