Legal Opinion

Safety Gas Lighter Co. v. Fischer Bros.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided July 29, 1916PublishedCited by 9 opinions

In Equity. Suit by the Safety Gas Lighter Company against Fischer Bros. & Corwin. On final hearing. Decree for defendant.

1Opinion of the Court

HAIGHT, District Judge.

The plaintiff is the owner of patent No. 1,011,643, issued to it as assignee of Frederick H. Porheroy on December 12, 1911, and patent No. 1,021,363, issued to Matchless Lighter Company, as assignee of Joseph B. Gould on March 26, 1912, and subsequently assigned to the plaintiff. Both patents relate to hand-operated devices for igniting gas. The defendant is engaged in the manufacture and sale of such a device, which, it is claimed, infringes claims 1, 2, 3, 9, 10, 11, and 12 of the Pomeroy patent, and claims 2, 3, and 5 of the Gould patent.

The devices of the patents in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Elizabeth v. Pavement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Clark Thread Co. v. Willimantic Linen Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Hanifen v. E. H. Godshalk Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1898
  4. Thayer v. HartU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1884
  5. Sirocco Engineering Co. v. B. F. Sturtevant Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. American Infra-Red Radiant Co. v. Lambert Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
  2. Bendix Corp. v. Balax, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970
  3. Reeves Brothers, Inc. v. US Laminating Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1968
  4. Permutit Co. v. Graver CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1930
  5. Permutit Co. v. WadhamCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API