Legal Opinion

Texas Indemnity Ins. Co. v. Wingo

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 24, 1932No. 3748PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHall, C. J.

This is a workmen’s compensation case. No question is raised with reference to the pleadings, and it is conceded that the conditions precedent to the filing of the suit have all been complied with.

The appellee Wingo alleges that he was an employee of the Fain-McGaha Oil Corporation, at an average weekly wage of $31.50, and had been thus engaged for more than a ■year. He alleges that while in the performance of his duties, his eyes were injured by reason of certain chemicals falling in his face which completely blinded .him for the time, causing great pain and suffering. That as a result of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ormsby v. RatcliffeTexas Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Barron v. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'nTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  3. Norwich Union Indemnity Co. v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  4. Howard v. Texas Employers' Ins.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1927

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Broughton v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  2. West v. CashinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  3. Texas Employers Ins. Ass'n v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  4. McClung Const. Co. v. MuncyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  5. Federal Underwriters Exchange v. CostCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API