Hooper v. State

OPINION

DUGGAN, Justice.

A jury found appellant guilty of unauthorized use of a motor vehicle, found that he had previously been convicted of felony offenses, and assessed his punishment at confinement for 25 years.

In two points of error, appellant contends that the evidence was insufficient to prove his guilt, and that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel.

The relevant portion of the indictment alleged that appellant:

on or about NOVEMBER 20, 1985, did then and there unlawfully intentionally and knowingly operate a motor-propelled vehicle, namely, an automobile owned by DOMINGO…