Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part
Wallace v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided July 1, 1981No. 65325Published
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partClinton, Judge
This is one of several death penalty cases submitted on rehearing in which is raised a common troublesome question: Where cause for reversal is found, what is the proper disposition of the judgment of the trial court? In this case the opinion for the court concludes:
“. .. We are of the opinion that the evidence is insufficient to support the ‘yes’ finding on the issue of future violent conduct. Consequently the death penalty must be set aside. See Sanne v. State, [Tex.Cr.App.] 609 S.W.2d 762; Brasfield v. State, [Tex.Cr.App.] 600 S.W.2d 288; Bullington v. Missouri, - U.S. -, 101 S.Ct. 1852,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Adams v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Bullington v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Brasfield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Sanne v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.