Legal Opinion
TADMS, INC. v. Consolidated Freightways
District Court, C.D. California
Decided August 16, 1985No. 83-2879 BG (Bx), 83-4008 RG (Bx) and CD-84-1250 BG (Bx)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
GADBOIS, District Judge.
This court, having read and considered the stipulated set of facts and all written material offered by the parties in support of their positions in this case, and having heard and considered the oral arguments of the parties in support of their positions, orders that judgment be entered in favor of the defendants and that the plaintiff take nothing.
BACKGROUND:
This case comprises three consolidated cases that were submitted for consideration and decision by this court on a stipulated statement of facts. This stipulation of facts, with a few important…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. MuggSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. York & Whitney Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Lowden v. Simonds-Shields-Lonsdale Grain Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dan Barclay, Inc. v. Stewart & Stevenson Services, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1991
- Balthazar v. Verizon Hawaii, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2005
- Pacificorp v. Northwest Pipeline GPDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2012
- Oneida Motor Freight, Inc. v. Felsway Corp. (In Re Oneida Motor Freight, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1987