Legal Opinion

Manternach v. Studt

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1909PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appear from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Parian Q. Bare, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cartwright

Most of the questions presented and argued by counsel for appellants were before the court on a former appeal and were then finally settled. (Manternach v. Studt, 230 Ill. 356.) The court decided that the proceeding in the probate court of Cook county to divest the appellee, John Manternach, of the undivided one-fourth of the lot described in his bill for partition, inherited from his father, Peter Manternach, was null and void for want of jurisdiction over appellee; that he was not bound by the warranties contained in a deed of said lot executed by his mother, for the reason that he did not…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lagger v. Mutual Union Loan & Building Ass'nIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Dean v. O'MearaIllinois Supreme Court · 1868
  3. Kinney v. KnoebelIllinois Supreme Court · 1868
  4. Mahoney v. MahoneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Bruschke v. WrightIllinois Supreme Court · 1897

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hutson v. WoodIllinois Supreme Court · 1914
  2. David v. SchiltzIllinois Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Commissioners of Lincoln Park v. SchmidtIllinois Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Hunt v. Meeker County Abstract & Loan Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  5. Trustees of Schools v. HoytIllinois Supreme Court · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API