Legal Opinion

Bostwick v. Department of Highways

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1980No. 14893PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Haswell

Defendant Department of Highways appeals from an interlocutory decision of the Beaverhead County District Court, sitting without a jury, that plaintiffs were entitled to compensation for the loss of reasonable access to their property. We dismiss the *314appeal without prejudice on the grounds that a final judgment has not yet been entered in this case and the interlocutory order is not appealable.

Plaintiffs are the owners of a warehouse located on East Helena and Washington Streets in Dillon, Montana. The warehouse serves the plaintiffs’ own trucking needs and provides rental space for various…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Great Falls National Bank v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1969

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Durden v. Hydro Flame Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1998
  2. In Re the Adjudication of the Existing Rights to the Use of All the Water, Both Surface & Underground, Within the Sage Creek Drainage AreaMontana Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Stevens v. AbbottMontana Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Bostwick v. Department of HighwaysMontana Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Durden v. Hydro Flame Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API