Legal Opinion

Welsch v. Keeton

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 27, 1926No. 7618PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFly, C. J.

This is a suit instituted by the appellees J. O. Keeton and Lillie Probandt Keeton, his wife, against Nathan M. Welsch and Arthur Shnitzer, appellants, for damages growing out of alleged misrepresentations made by appellants in regard to two lots of land in Hillerest addition to San Antonio which they sold to appellees. Appellants answered by general demurrer, special exceptions, and general denial, and set up a cross-action against appellees on the balance due on a promissory note executed by them. Appellees were duly cited to answer the cross-action, but when the cause was called for trial…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Holliday v. HollidayTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Lawther Grain Co. v. WinnifordTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  3. Cragin v. Henderson County Oil Development Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  4. Sharp v. Schmidt & ZeiglerTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  5. El Paso & Southwestern Railway Co. v. KelleyTexas Supreme Court · 1905

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hooser v. WolfeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  2. University Development Co. v. WolfCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  3. R. B. George MacHinery Co. v. City of MidlandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API