Frank v. Teachers Insurance & Annuity Ass'n of America
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bua
This is an interlocutory appeal under Supreme Court Rule 308 (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1973, ch. 110A, par. 308) raising the question of whether, in a suit brought on behalf of some 400,000 annuitants holding contracts with the defendant insurance companies, seeking reformation of those contracts so as to provide for a cash surrender value, due process requires that the named plaintiff notify absent class members of the pendency of the litigation. The trial court answered this question in the affirmative. We disagree, finding such notice to be unnecessary under the circumstances.
I. FACTS AND…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Hannah v. LarcheSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Reuben J. Katz, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Carte Blanche CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Frank v. Teachers Insurance & Annuity Ass'n of AmericaIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
- Hoover v. May Department Stores Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1978
- Hoover v. May Department Stores Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1978