Legal Opinion

Howland v. Local Union 306

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1948No. Docket No. 54, Calendar No. 44,172PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, C. J.

Plaintiff, Clarence W. A. How-land, at one time employed by The Budd Company of Detroit as a- tool crib attendant, earning $1.44 per hour, filed a bill of complaint seeking relief against defendants Local Union 306, UAW-CIO, Richard L. Schmidt, Lloyd Coffman, and John Lavey, individually and as officers of the defendant local union. He charged that defendants caused him to be discharged from his employment on December 22, 1947, and made it impossible for him to obtain employment of a similar nature. He alleged that, by reason of defendants’ wrongful acts, he suffered the loss of his earnings…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lucking v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Harris v. Detroit Typographical UnionMichigan Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Harrison v. Arrow Metal Products Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  2. Knox v. Local 900, United Automobile, Aircraft, Agricultural Implement Workers of AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Sewell v. Detroit Electrical Contractors Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Howland v. LOCAL UNION 306, UAW-CIOMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  5. McCann v. Local 12075, District 50, United Mine WorkersMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API