Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Knox v. Local 900, United Automobile, Aircraft, Agricultural Implement Workers of America

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1960No. Docket 45, Calendar 48,440PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1ConcurrenceBlack, J.

Plaintiff’s bill was dismissed on motion of defendants. He appeals.

A fair summary of the allegations and purpose of the bill, together with the chancellor’s primary reason for dismissal thereof, appears in the following connected portion of his opinion:

“Plaintiff filed a bill in equity divided into 2 divisions, or counts. In the first .count he seeks: (1) to be restored to membership in good standing in the defendant union; and (2) a mandatory injunction restraining defendants from interfering with his membership in good standing.- In count 2 he seeks' to enjoin defendants from expending any…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. International Union United Automobile, Aircraft & Agricultural Implement WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Hartley v. Brotherhood of RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Peoples Savings Bank v. StoddardMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Mayo v. Great Lakes Greyhound LinesMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Lamb v. JeffreyMichigan Supreme Court · 1879

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Lowe v. Hotel & Restaurant Employees Union, Local 705Michigan Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Harrison v. Arrow Metal Products Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. Field v. LOCAL 652 UAW AFL-CIOMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
  4. Kopke v. RanneyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  5. MacOn v. Huntsville UtilitiesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API