Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Dillihay

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 27, 1992Published

1DissentGaribaldi, J.

The Legislature clearly intended to create drug-free school zones through enactment of N.J.S.A. 2C:35-7 (Section 7). To accomplish that task, the Legislature made drug offenses carried out in school zones separately-punishable crimes, and increased mandatory-minimum penalties for drug transactions in school zones. In eliminating the separate school-zone violations through the doctrine of merger, the Court has turned the law on its head and created free-crime zones out of school yards.

Despite its assertion to the contrary, ante at 55, 601 A.2d at 1155, the majority permits a heroin pusher in a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. State v. DavisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
  4. Kimmelman v. Henkels & McCoy, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  5. State v. MillerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API