Legal Opinion

Dziekan v. Gaynor

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided June 13, 2005No. 3:03CV1486(WWE)PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

EGINTON, Senior District Judge.

This action arises from defendant Patrick Gaynor’s shooting of a dog owned by-plaintiff Craig Dziekan. Plaintiff alleges violation of his substantive due process and Fourth Amendment rights under the United States Constitution (counts three and four). He also asserts that defendants are liable for negligent and intentional infliction of emotional distress (counts one and five). Plaintiff has withdrawn his Fourteenth Amendment takings claim (count two), and his claim of negligent supervision (count six).

Defendants…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Tina Ray v. Michael RoaneCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
  2. Mark Brown v. Battle Creek Police Dep'tCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
  3. Frederique v. County of NassauDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2016
  4. Sanders v. City Of Rochester, New YorkDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2019
  5. Kendall v. OlsenDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2017

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API