Legal Opinion

People v. Hindman

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 27, 1998No. 98SA32PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The respondent in this lawyer discipline ease defaulted before the supreme court grievance committee and has not appeared in this court. A hearing panel of the grievance committee approved the findings and recommendation of a hearing board that the respondent be disbarred. We accept the recommendation and order that the respondent be disbarred.

I

The respondent was admitted to practice law in Colorado in. 1982. Because he did not answer the complaint filed in this case, a default was entered against him. The allegations of fact contained in the complaint were therefore deemed admitted. C.R.C.P.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. PiersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  2. People v. RoybalSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. ScottWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2003
  2. People v. WiedmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  3. Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. ScottWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2003
  4. People v. SolomonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API