People v. Hindman
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Per curiam
The respondent in this lawyer discipline ease defaulted before the supreme court grievance committee and has not appeared in this court. A hearing panel of the grievance committee approved the findings and recommendation of a hearing board that the respondent be disbarred. We accept the recommendation and order that the respondent be disbarred.
I
The respondent was admitted to practice law in Colorado in. 1982. Because he did not answer the complaint filed in this case, a default was entered against him. The allegations of fact contained in the complaint were therefore deemed admitted. C.R.C.P.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. PiersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- People v. RoybalSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. ScottWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2003
- People v. WiedmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
- Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. ScottWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2003
- People v. SolomonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2013