Legal Opinion

State v. S.-Q. K. (In re S.-Q. K.)

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 19, 2018No. A161045PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

*185Appellant has petitioned for reconsideration of our opinion in State v. S.-Q. K. , 292 Or. App. 836, 426 P.3d 659 (2018), requesting that we correct a factual error in the opinion. See ORAP 6.25(1)(a). Appellant asserts that the opinion "erroneously states that youth was adjudicated for riot, ORS 166.015. 292 Or. App. at 837, 426 P.3d 659, et seq. " Although the delinquency petition originally alleged riot, appellant points out that the juvenile court later amended the petition to conform to the evidence and youth was instead adjudicated for conduct that would constitute disorderly conduct in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. S.-Q. K. (In re S.-Q. K.)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. M. A. S.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  2. State v. C. L. B.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  3. State v. J. R.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  4. Flanders v. Winco Foods, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  5. Flanders v. Winco Foods, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API