Legal Opinion
Patterson v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided February 16, 2001No. 46A03-0003-CR-109PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION-ON REHEARING
DARDEN, Judge.
We grant Patterson's Petition For Rehearing for the sole purpose of clarifying our opinion. On December 18, 2000, we affirmed Samuel Patterson's ("Patterson") convictions for rape and burglary as class B felonies. Patterson v. State, 742 N.E.2d 4 (Ind.Ct.App.2000). In that case, we held that Patterson did not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the blood sample lawfully taken by police, pursuant to a search warrant, on December 6, 1997. Our analysis under the Fourth Amendment revealed that the State's subsequent DNA testing of Patterson's legally…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Griffin v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Vernonia School District 47J v. ActonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- National Treasury Employees Union v. Von RaabSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- O'CONNOR v. OrtegaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. HaugeHawaii Supreme Court · 2003
- People v. BaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Keeney v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Pharr v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2007
- State v. SandersCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.