Legal Opinion
Keeney v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided September 13, 2007No. 21A01-0611-CR-495PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NAJAM, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
James Keeney appeals the trial court’s order requiring him to provide a ■ DNA sample to the State after he pleaded guilty to Forgery, a Class C felony. He raises a single issue for our review, namely, whether Indiana Code Section 10-13-6-10, which requires felons to submit such DNA samples, is unconstitutional.
We affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On May 8, 2006, Keeney pleaded guilty to forgery, a Class C felony, in.connection with his management of the Connersville Municipal Airport in April of 2001. At his sentencing hearing on October. 10, 2006,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- City of Indianapolis v. EdmondSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Samson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Frith v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. O'HAGENSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
- United States v. StewartDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Anderson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- Galvan v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Cherie Solms v. Michael SolmsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- Matthew Marcus, II v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
- Nathan Anderson v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.