Legal Opinion
Ourisman Chevrolet, Inc. v. Suber
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided April 2, 1954No. 1481PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
QUINN, Associate Judge.
Appellant, plaintiff below, purchased a house wherein appellee, defendant below, was residing. Notice to quit was served on defendant and, when he refused to surrender possession of the premises, suit was brought in the Landlord and Tenant Branch of the MunicipaL Court. Prior to the filing of this action, defendant brought suit in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia against plaintiff and plaintiff’s vendors. The complaint alleged that defendant had a contract to purchase the property in question and prayed for specific performance. In addition,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Knowles v. MosherDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1946
- Mindell v. GlennDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949
- Nickles v. SullivanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1953
- Bradley v. Triplex Shoe Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mahoney v. CampbellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1965
- Turner v. DayDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Heller v. EdwardsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1954
- Thompson v. MazoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1968
- Sutton v. JonesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1962