Legal Opinion
Thompson v. Mazo
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided August 8, 1968No. 4173PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOOD, Chief Judge:
Appellant was sued in the Landlord and Tenant Branch of the Court of General Sessions for possession of a dwelling house. The complaint alleged appellant was a tenant at will and that her tenancy had been terminated by a thirty days’ notice to quit. 1 Appellant filed a plea of title, 2 alleging that she and her husband owned the property as tenants by the entirety and that appellee had purchased the property at foreclosure sale under a deed of trust on which her name was forged, and that she had filed an action in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Knowles v. MosherDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1946
- Thornhill v. Atlantic Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1934
- Nickles v. SullivanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1953
- Ourisman Chevrolet, Inc. v. SuberDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Attorney General v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- Young v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- Flowers v. Washington Federal Savings Bank (In Re Flowers)District Court, District of Columbia · 1988
- Banks v. Eastern Savings BankDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010