McKIBBEN v. THE STATE
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
DILLARD, Presiding Judge.
Following a stipulated bench trial, Kirby McKibben was convicted of driving under the influence (per se), driving under the influence (less safe), driving without headlights, and failure to maintain lane. McKibben appeals from his convictions by challenging the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence obtained in a warrantless blood test. Specifically, McKibben argues that he did not freely and voluntarily consent to the blood test under the standard set forth recently by our Supreme Court in Williams v. State. But because the trial court properly…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Birchfield v. N. Dakota. William Robert BernardSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2015
- Kendrick v. the StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
- Klink v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- MACMASTER v. the STATE.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
- The State v. JacobsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
- DIAZ v. the STATE.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
- HOLLAND v. the STATE.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
- The State v. NicholsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.