Legal Opinion
United States ex rel. Larkin v. Maryland Casualty Co.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided May 20, 1942No. Civ. A. No. 1215PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SWEENEY, District Judge.
In April, 1941, the plaintiff subcontractor, who will hereinafter be called the use plaintiff, brought this action under the Miller Act, 40 U.S.C.A. §§ 270a to 270d, against the Maryland Casualty Company as sole defendant. The complaint alleges that the J. Slotnik Company, hereinafter referred to as Slotnik, entered into a contract with the United States for the construction of one 500 men barracks at Fort Devens, Massachusetts, in connection with which it executed a bond as required by law, with the defendant Maryland Casualty Company as surety, binding it as…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Southern Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. SchendelSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Wilson's v. DeenSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Boston & Maine Railroad v. T. Stuart & Son Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
- Thompson v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1861
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lea, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1978
- Zeldman v. CelebrezzeDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1965
- United States v. Western Union Telegraph Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1943
- Lea, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1978
- United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company v. Hendry CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.