Legal Opinion

United States v. Western Union Telegraph Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 1, 1943PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HULBERT, District Judge.

The defendant, Western Union Telegraph Company moves: (1) For summary judgment ; (2) to add parties, or in the alternative, to dismiss the plaintiff’s complaint for lack of indispensable parties.

Plaintiff moves for a temporary injunction.

Defendant’s motion number one is granted, which renders unnecessary the consideration and determination of the other motions.

In this action the Government seeks to compel the application of the rental sums of $75,000, which become due on July 1 and January 1 of each year under a lease of May 7, 1881, between the Northwestern Telegraph…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Blair v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Baldwin v. Iowa State Traveling Men's Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Tait v. Western Maryland Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. New Orleans v. Citizens' BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1897

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Travelers Ins. Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
  2. J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API