Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bruce Plante v. Ronald P. Long

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided September 7, 2017No. Docket: Yor-16-538Published

1DissentJabar, J.

I. INTRODUCTION

[¶ 20] I respectfully dissent because the Court has improperly used summary judgment to resolve factual disputes regarding motivation, knowledge, ' or intent. The *250plaintiffs, Dennis and Brace Plante, are entitled to have a jury decide, whether Long fabricated facts surrounding events that occurred between the Plantes and Long.

II. DISCUSSION

[¶ 21] The Court correctly sets out the actual malice element of the Plantes’ defamation claim against Long, that the Plantes must prove “that the defamatory material was published with actual malice.” Ballard v. Wagner, 2005 ME 86, ¶ 10, 877…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Masson v. New Yorker Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Lester v. PowersSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
  3. Mahoney v. Adirondack Publishing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Stanley v. Hancock County CommissionersSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2004
  5. Levesque v. DoocyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API