Legal Opinion

Columbus Bar Assn. v. Foster

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 2001No. 2001-0368PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 92 Ohio St.3d 411.] COLUMBUS BAR ASSOCIATION v. FOSTER. [Cite as Columbus Bar Assn. v. Foster,

2001-Ohio-199.] Attorneys at law—Misconduct—Indefinite suspension—Pattern and practice of carelessness, inattention to detail, procrastination, and failure to communicate with clients and court officials in practicing bankruptcy law. (No. 01-368—Submitted April 2, 2001—Decided July 18, 2001.) ON CERTIFIED REPORT by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court, No. 00-42. __________________ Per Curiam. {¶ 1}…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Columbus Bar Ass'n v. FlanaganOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Dayton Bar Ass'n v. AndrewsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. WolosinOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Columbus Bar Ass'n v. FosterOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Columbus Bar Assn. v. FlanaganOhio Supreme Court · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Columbus Bar Assn. v. FosterOhio Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API