Legal Opinion

Hernandez v. Yacco

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 30, 1994PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted summary judgment dismissing the complaint. In support of their motion, defendants submitted evidence sufficient to demonstrate, as a matter of law, that plaintiff had not suffered a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) (see, Gaddy v Eyler, 79 NY2d 955; DuMont v Sandhir, 201 AD2d 450; Logan v Laidlaw School Tr., 175 AD2d 568). Plaintiff, in opposition to the motion, failed "to make a prima facie showing of serious injury sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact” (Costa v…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gaddy v. EylerNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Costa v. BillingsleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  3. Logan v. Laidlaw School Transit, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  4. Dumont v. SandhirAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Borrman v. BogoldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API