Legal Opinion

Borrman v. Bogold

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 12, 1996PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion granted and complaint dismissed. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in denying defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint in this personal injury action. Defendant submitted evidence in admissible form establishing as a matter of law that plaintiff did not sustain a "serious injury” within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d), thereby shifting the burden to plaintiff to raise a triable issue of fact (see, Gaddy v Eyler, 79 NY2d 955, 956-957; Hernandez v Yacco, 207 AD2d 1029). Plaintiff did not meet that burden.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gaddy v. EylerNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Licari v. ElliottNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Scheer v. KoubekNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Logan v. Laidlaw School Transit, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  5. Eldred v. StoddardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Monette v. KellerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. Thousand v. HedbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. Bunk v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Utica-Watertown, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API