Borrman v. Bogold
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion granted and complaint dismissed. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in denying defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint in this personal injury action. Defendant submitted evidence in admissible form establishing as a matter of law that plaintiff did not sustain a "serious injury” within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d), thereby shifting the burden to plaintiff to raise a triable issue of fact (see, Gaddy v Eyler, 79 NY2d 955, 956-957; Hernandez v Yacco, 207 AD2d 1029). Plaintiff did not meet that burden.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gaddy v. EylerNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Licari v. ElliottNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Scheer v. KoubekNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Logan v. Laidlaw School Transit, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Eldred v. StoddardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Monette v. KellerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Thousand v. HedbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Bunk v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Utica-Watertown, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1996