Heintz v. LePage
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
On motion by defendants. Assumpsit on account annexed to recover $770 for “Paragon Malt Extract” sold and delivered by the plaintiffs, residents of the State of New York, to the defendants, residents of Maine, October 2lst, November 5th, and December 19th, 1903, the entire quantity being 6Ó barrels containing 800 dozen or 9600 bottles. Tried at January term, 1905, Supreme Judicial Court, Penobscot County.
Read the full summary
On motion by defendants. Assumpsit on account annexed to recover $770 for “Paragon Malt Extract” sold and delivered by the plaintiffs, residents of the State of New York, to the defendants, residents of Maine, October 2lst, November 5th, and December 19th, 1903, the entire quantity being 6Ó barrels containing 800 dozen or 9600 bottles. Tried at January term, 1905, Supreme Judicial Court, Penobscot County. Plea, the general issue with a brief statement alleging “that the claim or demand in the above entitled case is wholly for intoxicating liquors sold in violation of chapter 29, section 64,…
1Opinion of the CourtSpear, J.
This is an action of assumpsit to recover the sum of $770 on the following account. 1903, October 21st, to Mdse. $210. Nov. 5, to Mdse. $420. Dec. 19, to Mdse. $210. $840. The first charge in this account was for 20 barrels, 200 dozen Paragon Malt Extract. The second charge was for 40 barrels, 400 dozen Paragon Malt Extract. The third charge was for 20 barrels, 200 dozen Paragon Malt Extract. In other words, from the 21st day of October, 1903, to Dec. 19th, 1903, a little less than two months, the plaintiffs in this case sent to the defendants at Milliuocket, Maine, 60 barrels containing 800…
2Cited by3 opinions
- State v. TorelloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
- The People v. CioppiIllinois Supreme Court · 1926
- People v. ThompsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1907