Legal Opinion · Dissent

Gerald L. Naekel v. Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided June 28, 1988No. 87-3274Published

1DissentPauline Newman, Circuit Judge

I join all aspects of the court’s opinion except that of Part A, to which I respectfully dissent. I concur in the rationale of Part B, but because of my conclusion as to Part A, the calculation of Part B would of course be based on the required progression in grade.

As to the issues of grade and level, I believe that this case fully meets the standards of the Federal Personnel Manual and interpretive decisions, as discussed infra, requiring that Mr. Naekel’s back pay and overtime be calculated at the grade progression set by the “Up or Out Policy” of FAA Form 3300-39 and the Training…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Wicker v. HoppockSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  3. Harry L. Boese v. Department of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
  4. Gunston v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
  5. Ciambelli v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API