Legal Opinion

Frey v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 18, 1983No. Appeal, No. 1535 C.D. 1982PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

President Judge Crumlish, Jr.,

The City of Pittsburgh appeals an Allegheny County Common Pleas Court order granting a variance. We reverse and remand.

Gary and Victoria Frey’s application for a variance to maintain a parking pad on .their residential property was denied for failure to meet certain setback requirements. Pittsburgh’s Zoning Board of Adjustment (Board), in denying the variance, failed to make findings of fact in support of the denial. On appeal, the court below made its ¡own factual findings based on the Board record, citing Section 1010 of the Municipalities Planning…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ramondo v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. North Point Breeze Coalition v. City of PittsburghCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Boehm v. Board of EducationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Foley v. Civil Service CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. King Productions, Inc. v. Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lamar Advantage GP Co. v. Zoning Hearing Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Allegheny West Civic Council, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Society Created to Reduce Urban Blight v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Brighton Enterprises, Inc. v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Melwood Corp. v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API