Legal Opinion
Joseph v. Roldan
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 3, 2001PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal, dated July 29, 1999, which denied a petition for administrative review and confirmed a determination of the District Rent Administrator dated July 12, 1996, that the petitioner’s apartment had been decontrolled and that the apartment was subject to the Rent Stabilization Code, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Berke, J.), dated May 12, 2000, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.
Ordered that the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Capital Telephone Co. v. Pattersonville Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Bernstein v. Birch Wathen SchoolAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Bernstein v. Birch Wathen SchoolNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Chatsworth 72nd Street Corp. v. RigaiNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Chatsworth 72nd Street Corp. v. RigaiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Krajca v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Buxbaum v. TessierAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Freemonde v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003