Legal Opinion
United States Ex Rel. Bayly v. Reckord
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided August 16, 1943No. Civil Actions 2025, 2024PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHESNUT, District Judge.
In these two habeas corpus cases the petitioners seek present release from the Army and Navy respectively on the ground that in ordering their induction at this time their local Selective Service Board intentionally disregarded the applicable regulation prescribing the order of selection for inductees. In their answers filed in the cases the respective respondents take the position that they have no direct knowledge or official information as to the propriety of selection of the petitioners by the Local11'. Board but that they have been informed by the Board that the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hirabayashi v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Goff v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1943
- Rase v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
- Bowles v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Arbitman v. WoodsideCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1919
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Trainin v. CainCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Ex Parte Stanziale.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943
- United States ex rel. La Charity v. Commanding Officer of United States Army Induction CenterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- United States v. EstepCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
- United States v. Gregg Steven StrayhornCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.