Legal Opinion

State v. Natale

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided November 17, 2004PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

861 A.2d 148 (2004)

373 N.J. Super. 226

STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

Michael J. NATALE, Defendant-Appellant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued November 3, 2004.

Decided November 17, 2004.

Edward J. Crisonino, Cherry Hill, argued the cause for appellant.

Jeanne Screen, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent State of New Jersey (Peter C. Harvey, Attorney General, attorney; Ms. Screen, of counsel and on the brief). Linda Mehling, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, and Steven G. Sanders argued the cause for amici curiae Office of the Public Defender…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. State v. YarboughSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. NataleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
  2. State v. SchofieldSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
  3. State v. VasquezNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
  4. State v. MooreNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
  5. State v. JimenezNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API